THE TAX REVOLUTION AMERICA NEEDS: HOW THE EXTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND FAIR TAX ACT WILL BENEFIT EVERY AMERICAN
The American tax system is broken.
For decades, hardworking citizens have endured a Byzantine tax code that punishes productivity, rewards complexity, and empowers an ever-growing bureaucracy. The current graduated income tax system has metastasized into a labyrinth of brackets, deductions, and exemptions that costs Americans not just in taxes paid, but in countless hours and billions of dollars spent simply complying with an incomprehensible system.
But a radical solution is gaining momentum. The Fair Tax Act of 2025 (H.R. 25) represents not just another tax reform proposal, but a complete paradigm shift in how America funds its government. This legislation, coupled with the creation of the External Revenue Service, offers a pathway to liberate Americans from the burden of income taxation while ensuring the government can still fund essential services.
This transformation would replace our graduated income tax system with a simple flat tax on consumption, shifting the tax burden from production to spending, and from American workers to the broader economy. The implications for economic growth, personal freedom, and government accountability are profound.
The Fair Tax Act: A True Game-Changer
The Fair Tax Act of 2025 isn't just another adjustment to tax brackets or deduction rules. It represents a fundamental reimagining of the federal tax system. The legislation would abolish the entire federal income tax code, along with payroll taxes and estate taxes, replacing them with a single national sales tax of 23% on new goods and services.
This isn't tinkering at the edges – it's a complete overhaul that would transform how government interacts with citizens and the economy. The current system extracts revenue directly from your paycheck before you ever see it. The Fair Tax would instead collect revenue only when you choose to spend money on new goods and services.
The most immediate and visible impact would be the elimination of the IRS as we know it. No more income tax returns. No more payroll tax withholding. No more fear of audits targeting middle-class Americans. The Fair Tax would end the intrusive relationship between citizens and tax collectors, replacing it with a system that respects privacy and economic freedom.
For too long, Americans have accepted as normal a system where the government takes first claim on their earnings. The Fair Tax flips this relationship, putting citizens back in control of their money and making taxation transparent rather than hidden.
The Hidden Cost of Our Current Tax System
The true cost of America's tax system extends far beyond the taxes we pay. The current system bleeds $444 billion annually in compliance costs alone – money that should remain in taxpayers' pockets but instead goes to accountants, tax preparers, and the vast infrastructure required to navigate our complex tax code.
These compliance costs represent a massive hidden tax on productivity. Small businesses spend countless hours on tax paperwork instead of serving customers or developing new products. Families waste evenings and weekends gathering documents and filling out forms. The economic drag from these activities is immense but largely invisible in official statistics.
Even worse, the graduated income tax system creates perverse incentives throughout the economy. It punishes additional work, discourages saving and investment, and rewards debt over equity financing. These distortions ripple through the economy, reducing growth and opportunity for all Americans.
The current system also enables government growth by making taxation less visible. When taxes are withheld from paychecks, citizens feel less pain than if they had to write a check for the full amount. This reduced transparency makes it easier for government to expand without facing the full accountability that should come with taking citizens' money.
The External Revenue Service: Taxation Without Harassment
The creation of the External Revenue Service represents a revolutionary approach to government funding. Rather than extracting revenue directly from citizens' earnings, the ERS would focus on collecting tariffs, duties, and the national sales tax, shifting the burden away from American workers and toward consumption and international trade.
This transformation would end the era of intrusive tax enforcement that has seen the IRS grow into one of the most feared government agencies. The External Revenue Service would have a fundamentally different relationship with citizens – one based on transactions rather than surveillance of income and assets.
The ERS would primarily work with businesses collecting the sales tax and with customs operations at ports of entry, not with individual citizens. This structural change would dramatically reduce the points of friction between Americans and their government, enhancing both freedom and privacy.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has articulated the vision clearly: "Donald Trump announced the External Revenue Service, and his goal is very simple: to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and let all the outsiders pay." This approach recognizes that America can fund essential government functions without directly taxing the productive activities of its citizens.
How the Fair Tax Benefits All Americans
The Fair Tax would deliver significant benefits across all economic classes, not just for the wealthy. In fact, lower and middle-income Americans stand to gain substantially from this transformation.
For lower-income Americans, the Fair Tax includes a "prebate" mechanism – a monthly rebate sent to all registered families that effectively exempts spending on necessities from taxation. This feature makes the system progressive in practice, ensuring that those with the least means pay the lowest effective tax rates.
Middle-class families would benefit from the elimination of payroll taxes, which currently take a 15.3% bite out of every dollar earned (including the employer portion). This immediate boost to take-home pay would provide relief to millions of working Americans struggling with rising costs.
All Americans would benefit from the simplicity and transparency of the new system. No more tax forms. No more record-keeping for tax purposes. No more fear of making mistakes that could trigger audits. The psychological benefit of this freedom should not be underestimated.
The economic benefits would extend beyond direct tax savings. By eliminating taxes on productivity, saving, and investment, the Fair Tax would unleash economic growth that benefits everyone. More jobs, higher wages, and increased opportunity would result from removing the current system's penalties on productive activity.
Addressing the Critics: Revenue and Progressivity
Critics of the Fair Tax and External Revenue Service concept raise two primary concerns: revenue adequacy and progressivity. Both concerns deserve serious consideration but ultimately don't undermine the case for reform.
On revenue, critics argue that tariffs and sales taxes couldn't replace the approximately $2.4 trillion currently raised through income taxes. This view ignores several key factors. First, the Fair Tax would apply to a broader base than the current income tax, capturing economic activity that currently goes untaxed. Second, compliance would likely improve under a simpler system with fewer opportunities for evasion.
Most importantly, the current system enables wasteful government spending by making taxation less visible and accountability more difficult. As the DogeAI tweet notes, "the status quo lets bureaucrats burn $2.4 trillion annually on programs that fail audits." The Fair Tax would force greater fiscal discipline by making the cost of government more transparent to citizens.
On progressivity, critics argue that consumption taxes are inherently regressive. This criticism overlooks the prebate mechanism built into the Fair Tax, which effectively creates a progressive rate structure by providing a universal rebate that covers tax on necessities. When combined with the elimination of regressive payroll taxes, the overall impact for lower and middle-income Americans would be positive.
The current system's claim to progressivity also ignores the many ways wealthy individuals can legally avoid taxes through sophisticated planning strategies. A simpler system with fewer loopholes would likely result in the wealthy paying a fairer share.
The Economic Growth Potential
The economic benefits of replacing our graduated income tax with the Fair Tax would be substantial and far-reaching. By eliminating taxes on productivity, saving, and investment, the new system would remove major barriers to economic growth.
Research from the Brookings Institution suggests that shifting to a consumption-based tax system could increase national saving by 0.5% to 1% of GDP. This increased saving would provide more capital for business investment, leading to greater productivity and higher wages over time.
The simplicity of the new system would also yield significant efficiency gains. Businesses would no longer need to make decisions based on tax considerations rather than economic fundamentals. This would lead to better allocation of resources throughout the economy.
The elimination of payroll taxes would reduce the cost of hiring, encouraging job creation. Meanwhile, the removal of taxes on investment would spur capital formation and business expansion. These effects would combine to create more opportunities for American workers at all skill levels.
Perhaps most importantly, the Fair Tax would make America more competitive internationally. By removing embedded taxes from the price of American goods and services, our exports would become more competitive in global markets. Meanwhile, imports would face the same tax as domestic products, creating a level playing field.
Implementation: A Practical Pathway Forward
Transitioning from our current tax system to the Fair Tax and External Revenue Service model would require careful planning and execution. The Fair Tax Act includes provisions for a orderly transition, with the sales tax taking effect only after the repeal of the 16th Amendment, which authorized the income tax.
The implementation would begin with the establishment of the External Revenue Service to handle tariff collection and prepare for the eventual sales tax administration. States would play a crucial role in this new system, with the federal government partnering with state tax authorities to collect the national sales tax alongside existing state sales taxes.
The transition period would allow businesses and individuals to adapt to the new system. Educational campaigns would help Americans understand how the prebate system works and how to register for their monthly rebates.
While any major system change involves adjustment costs, these would be far outweighed by the long-term benefits of a simpler, more efficient tax system. The transition would be a worthwhile investment in America's economic future.
Conclusion: A Tax System Worthy of America
The combination of the Fair Tax Act and External Revenue Service represents a vision for taxation that aligns with America's founding principles of liberty and limited government. By shifting from taxing production to taxing consumption, and from harassing citizens to collecting revenue at the border and point of sale, this reform would enhance both freedom and prosperity.
The current graduated income tax system has failed Americans across the economic spectrum. It's complex, intrusive, economically harmful, and enables government growth beyond what citizens would willingly support if taxation were more transparent.
The Fair Tax offers a better way forward – a system that respects citizens' privacy, rewards productivity, simplifies compliance, and makes government more accountable. It would benefit Americans of all income levels while creating conditions for stronger economic growth.
As we consider the future of taxation in America, we should think beyond incremental reforms to our broken system. The Fair Tax and External Revenue Service concept offers the transformational change we need – a tax revolution that would benefit every American and strengthen our nation for generations to come.
Questa proposta corrisponde alla imposta iva applicata in Italia al 22%. Domanda: le aziende che acquistano le merci per lavorarle, pagheranno la tassa 23% su quelle merci o saranno esentate? In Italia imposta sugli alimenti é del 5% circa. Le case e terreni avranno imposta acquisto del 23%?